![]() ![]() “The Panel requests that the Parties each provide a further filing as follows. On November 12, 2021, the Panel issued a Procedural Order (the “Procedural Order”). The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. Gardner as the sole panelist in this matter on November 8, 2021. The Response was filed with the Center on October 18, 2021. The Center received email communications on September 16, 17, 21, 22, and October 17, 2021, from the Respondent. In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5, the due date for Response was October 11, 2021, and was extended until October 15, 2021. In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2 and 4, the Center formally notified the Respondent of the Complaint, and the proceedings commenced on September 21, 2021. The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). The Complainant filed an amendment to the Complaint on September 20, 2021. The Center sent an email communication to the Complainant on September 15, 2021, providing the registrant and contact information disclosed by the Registrar, and inviting the Complainant to submit an amendment to the Complaint. On August 12, 2021, the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response disclosing registrant and contact information for the Disputed Domain Name which differed from the named Respondent and contact information in the Complaint. ![]() On August 11, 2021, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the Disputed Domain Name. The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on August 10, 2021. The disputed domain name (the “Disputed Domain Name”) is registered with PDR Ltd. The Respondent is Jake Seal, United States of America (“United States” or “US”). The Complainant is ORWO Net GmbH, Germany, represented by lexTM Rechtsanwaelte, Germany. ![]() “It’s to step ahead and create a safe way to download quality films.WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION ORWO Net GmbH v. The business will be for the producer,” Fraguas said. Not content to simply keep abreast of the opportunities in the digital world, EGEDA has started talks with Yahoo, Google and other titans to develop new marketing - including the introduction of hyperlinks to the Filmotech portal. Marshall.”įraguas said the portal, which launched only in Spain in late March, had lifted the international blockade and was available worldwide.ĮGEDA does not charge producers for the digitalization of their product, with 70% of the revenue going to the producer and 30% reinvested in Filmotech. The site, which has 250 titles, will include features, documentaries and animation and initially will charge 1 ($1.34) for rentals and €5.8 ($7.78) for the sale of the films in its catalog, which includes such hits as Alejandro Amenabar’s “The Others” and “The Sea Inside” and Julio Medem’s “Sex and Lucia” and classics like Luis Garcia Berlanga’s “Welcome Mr. “If not, we will be run over by the big distributors that will tell us what we have to do.” “Rights-holders and producers need to join forces to survive,” he said. Ehrhardt appealed to other producers to follow suit. The question was how to do it,” Bo Ehrhardt of Nimbus Films said on behalf of the Danish digital rights platform E-Films, explaining how E-Films came to the EGEDA initiative.Į-Films has united with EGEDA, offering Danish content for Filmotech. There’s a fantastic future, full of wealth, in VOD. “As an independent producer from Denmark, I realized that VOD is the future. The move looks to harness VOD rights, strengthen producers’ positions in negotiations with distributors and tap into the wave of downloaded movies from a position of power.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |